GUIDELINES FOR WRITING ARTICLE JURNAL ABDIMAS PARIWISATA
Article writing criteria for Jurnal Abdmas Pariwisata (JAP) article writers follow the format, composition, and standard of writing scientific journal articles.
Manuscripts that are not following the instructions for writing Jurnal Abdmas Pariwisata (JAP) will be returned to the author before proceeding to the review process. The article must be at least 4,000 words or 12-15 pages.
Articles are written using the 2 column format with A4 (paper size), left margin 2.5 cm, right margin 2.5 cm, bottom margin 3 cm and top margin 2 cm.
The manuscript is written in Times New Roman font size of 12 pt (except the article title 16 Pt, author's name 10Pt and abstract title 12 pt) and one space spacing, MS Word format.
Articles are written using Indonesian following the Indonesian Spelling General Guidelines "Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia (PUEBI)". Articles are written using English following standard grammatical English
The article begins with the title of the article (12 pt Bold). While the author's name, author's affiliate address, accompanied by the author's email address (10 pt). The title of the article is written briefly, a maximum of 15 words. The title shows that the problem to be raised does not provide opportunities for diverse interpretations.
Abstracts are written in Indonesian and English (accompanied by English titles). English titles and abstracts are written in italics (12 pt - Italic).
The maximum length of the abstract is 150 words, accompanied by keywords 3 to 5 words. The abstract only contains the purpose of the article and the scope of the study, the method, a summary of results written concisely and clearly.
In the introduction described: a little general background of the study, state of the art (a brief literature review) previous studies that are similar to justify novelty, gap analysis or statement of the gap or novelty, different unique from previous studies, problems and, or hypotheses, if any, approach to problem-solving (if any), expected outcomes or benefits.
LITERATURE REVIEW (If applicable)
It contains various theories used. It is not allowed to use any numbering or pointer in writing.
The work procedure of the research is clearly written so that the experiment or research can be repeated with the same results.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Contains the following description: the data presented has been processed in a table or figure (select one), provide information that is easy to understand. There is a connection between the results obtained and the basic concepts and or hypotheses, whether there is compatibility or disagreement with the results of other people's research, and recommendations of the implications of both theoretical research and its application. It is not allowed to use any numbering or pointer in writing.
A brief and precise description of sufficient answer to the problem or purpose of the study (do not discuss again); is a conclusion from the author logically and honestly based on the facts obtained; add implications or suggestions (not required). It should be written in paragraph form, not in the form of an item list or numbering.
It is not allowed to use any numbering or pointer in writing.
Writing a bibliography using is the American Psychological Association (APA) sixth format.
References use "primary literature" such as journal articles, proceeding article; research book; thesis/dissertation; and others. It is recommended to use relevant articles from Media Wisata.
The minimum reference number is 15 from primary sources.
All sources referred to in the article text must be written in the bibliography. Instead, everything written in a bibliography should be referred to in the article text (body text)
It is best to use a reference manager application like Mendeley.
PEDOMAN PENULISAN ARTIKEL MEDIA WISATA
Ketentuan kriteria penulisan artikel bagi para penulis artikel Media Wisata mengikuti format, susunan, dan standart penulisan artikel jurnal ilmiah. Naskah manuskrip yang tidak sesuai petunjuk penulisan Media Wisata akan dikembalikan kepada penulis sebelum dilanjutkan ke proses review. Panjang artikel minimal 4.000 kata, atau 12-15 halaman.
Artikel ditulis menggunakan format 2 kolom dengan ukuran kertas A4, margin kiri 2,5 cm, margin kanan 2,5 cm, margin bawah 3 cm dan margin atas 2 cm
Naskah ditulis dengan jenis huruf Times New Roman berukuran 12 pt (kecuali judul artikel 16 Pt, nama penulis 10Pt dan judul abstrak 12 pt) dan jarak 1 spasi, format MS Word.
Artikel ditulis dengan menggunakkan bahasa Indonesia sesuai Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia (PUEBI) atau dengan Bahasa Inggris standar gramatikal
Artikel diawali dengan judul artikel (12 pt Bold). Sedangkan nama penulis, alamat afiliasi penulis, disertai alamat email penulis (10 pt). Judul artikel ditulis secara singkat, maksimal 15 kata. Judul menunjukan masalah yang hendak dikemukakan, tidak memberi peluang penafsiran yang beraneka ragam.
Abstrak ditulis menggunakan bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Inggris (disertai dengan judul Bahasa Inggris). Judul dan abstrak Bahasa Inggris ditulis dengan huruf miring (12 pt - Italic). Panjang maksimum abstrak 150 kata, disertai kata kunci 3 sampai 5 kata. Abstrak hanya berisi: tujuan artikel dan ruang lingkup penelitian, metode, ringkasan hasil yang ditulis singkat dan jelas.
Pada bagian pendahuluan diuraikan: sedikit latar belakang umum kajian, state of the art (kajian review literatur singkat) penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya yang mirip untuk menjustifikasi novelty, gap analysis atau pernyataan kesenjangan atau kebaruan (novelty statement), beda unik dengan penelitian sebelumnya, permasalahan dan, atau hipotesis jika ada, cara pendekatan penyelesaian masalah (jika ada), hasil atau manfaat yang diharapkan.
LITERATUR REVIEW (Jika Ada)
Memuat berbagai teori yang digunakan. Tidak diperkenankan menggunakan penomoran atau pointer apapun dalam penulisan.
Tata kerja penelitian ditulis secara jelas, sehingga percobaan atau penelitian tersebut dapat diulang dengan hasil yang sama.
HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN
Memuat uraian berikut: data yang disajikan telah diolah dituangkan dalam tabel atau gambar (pilih salah satu), beri keterangan yang mudah dipahami, pada bagian pembahasan diuraikan adanya kaitan antara hasil yang diperoleh dan konsep dasar dan/atau hipotesis, apakah ada kesesuaian atau pertentangan dengan hasil penelitian orang lain, juga rekomendasi dari implikasi hasil penelitian baik teoretis maupun penerapannya. Tidak diperkenankan menggunakan penomoran atau pointer apapun dalam penulisan.
Uraian secara singkat dan jelas tentang: cukup menjawab permasalahan atau tujuan penelitian (jangan membahas lagi); merupakan simpulan dari penulis secara logis dan jujur berdasarkan fakta yang diperoleh; boleh ditambahkan implikasi atau saran (tidak wajib). Sebaiknya dituliskan dalam bentuk paragraf, bukan dalam bentuk item list/numbering.
Tidak diperkenankan menggunakan penomoran atau pointer apapun dalam penulisan.
Penulisan daftar pustaka menggunakan adalah format APA 6 (American Psychological Association).
Referensi menggunakan “literatur primer” seperti: artikel jurnal; artikel prosiding; buku penelitian; thesis/disertasi; dan lain-lain. Disarankan menggunakan artikel relevan dari Media Wisata.
Jumlah referensi minimal 15 dari sumber primer.
Semua sumber yang dirujuk dalam teks artikel harus ditulis dalam daftar pustaka. Sebaliknya, semua yang ditulis dalam daftar pustaka harus dirujuk dalam teks artikel (body text)
Sebaiknya memakai aplikasi reference manager seperti Mendeley.
PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT
Jurnal Abdmas Pariwisata (JAP)is a peer-reviewed electronic journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher "Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata AMPTA". This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Abdmas Pariwisata (JAP) journal is an essential building block in developing a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the authors' work and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore essential to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.
The publisher of Jurnal Abdmas Pariwisata (JAP) journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Nama Publisher and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and or publishers where this is useful and necessary.
The editor of the Jurnal Abdmas Pariwisata (JAP) journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journals editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in own editor research without the authors express written consent.
Duties of The Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions, and the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that the authors have not cited. The relevant citation should accompany any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported. A reviewer should also call the Editors attention to any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper they have personal knowledge of.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Authors reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed and an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and or words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concureent
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal currently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper. All co-authors have seen the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, humans, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must identify these in the manuscript.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose any financial or another substantive conflict of interest in their manuscript that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her published work, the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.