Bottom-Up Touristification in Yogyakarta after Pandemic Covid-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36276/mws.v22i1.639Keywords:
Touristification, Tourism village, Tourism, Changes in function and environmentAbstract
This research was conducted to identify the bottom-up touristification phenomenon that occurred in the city of Yogyakarta after the Covid-19 pandemic. This research is a qualitative research. Data was collected through a process of observation and secondary data survey. The analysis techniques used are spatial analysis and also qualitative descriptive. The results of this research show that the touristification phenomenon occurring in Yogyakarta can be identified through changes in function and environment both visually and non-visually as well as changes in mobility aspects. Changes in function and environment can be seen both visually from the development of spatial concentration and the spread of tourists, changing the function of the area into a tourist area, and also the increase in facilities for tourists. Changes in function and environment non-visually can be seen from the development and distribution of accommodation which increases community profits and encourages tourists to travel to places that were not originally tourist attractions. Changes in the mobility aspect can be seen from changes of roads function as part of attractions which can then encourage environmentally friendly habits in the community. In the end, this touristifcation phenomenon can indirectly help tourism activities to adapt after the Covid-19 pandemic. The government is expected to increase its support to ensure that this touristification phenomenon can run according to the carrying capacity and capacity of tourism in Yogyakarta city.
References
Coll-Ramis, M. À., Almeida-García, F., Cortés-Macías, R., & Hosseini, S. (2023). Touristification Process in Seaside Destination Inland: The Case of Mallorca Island, Spain. In Urban Book Series: Vol. Part F1256 (Issue August). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36017-6_13
Davies, N. (2018). Who walks, where and why? Practitioners’ observations and perspectives on recreational walkers at UK tourist destinations. Annals of Leisure Research, 21(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2016.1250648
de la Calle Vaquero, M., Mínguez, C., & García-Hernández, M. (2023). The touristification of urban spaces: measurement proposal. Boletin de La Asociacion de Geografos Espanoles, 99. https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.3459
Estevens, A., Cocola-Gant, A., López-Gay, A., & Pavel, F. (2023). The role of the state in the touristification of Lisbon. Cities, 137(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104275
Freytag, T., & Bauder, M. (2018). Bottom-up touristification and urban transformations in Paris. Tourism Geographies, 20(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1454504
Hayllar, B., Griffin, T., & Edwards, D. (2011). City spaces – Tourist places: Urban tourism precincts. URBAN DESIGN International, 16(2), 142–144. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2010.6
Huyugüzel Kişla, G. Ş., Türkcan, B., & Ince Yenilmez, M. (2023). How COVID-19 Has Affected Supply and Demand Within Tourism Industry. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism, 8(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.31822/jomat.2023-8-1-39
Jensen, O. B. (2009). Flows of meaning, cultures of movements - Urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities, 4(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100802658002
Jeon, C. Y., & Yang, H. W. (2021). The structural changes of a local tourism network: comparison of before and after COVID-19. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(23), 3324–3338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1874890
Maitland, R. A. (2008). Conviviality and everyday life: The appeal of new areas of London for visitors. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.621
Nizar, M. A. (2015). Tourism Effect on Economic Growth in Indonesia. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), 7(65628), 1–25. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/65628/
Ojeda, A. B., & Kieffer, M. (2020). Touristification. Empty concept or element of analysis in tourism geography? Geoforum, 115(June), 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.021
Picard, M. (2003). Touristification and balinization in a time of Reformasi. Indonesia and the Malay World, 31(89), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639810304435
Stors, N., & Kagermeier, A. (2013). Crossing the Border of the Tourist Bubble: Touristifi cation in Copenhagen. In Natalie Stors & Andreas Kagermeier.
Suryanto, Djunaedi, A., & Sudaryono. (2015). Aspek Budaya Dalam Keistimewaan Tata Ruang Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota, 26(3), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2015.26.3.6
Wen, X., Fu, D., Diao, Y., Wang, B., Gao, X., & Jiang, M. (2023). Exploring the Relationship between Touristification and Commercial Gentrification from the Perspective of Tourist Flow Networks: A Case Study of Yuzhong District, Chongqing. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612577
Woo, E., Kim, H., & Kim, Y. G. (2022). Touristification phenomenon and support for tourism development. Anatolia, 33(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2021.1906287
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shinta Permana Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
